Four-project portfolio — interview map
Each product addresses a separate business problem. These are the paths to the owning evidence; this AKS site does not certify another repo's current deployment, CI, test count, or security scan.
| Product | Business question | Evidence boundary |
|---|---|---|
| OpsBridge | Can flash-sale orders avoid oversell and can operations reconcile asynchronous events? | Concurrency, Saga, outbox/inbox and operational review live in its own repository. |
| QuanLyKho | Can a tea shop control lot/expiry inventory and require a different human checker before posting? | FastAPI/PostgreSQL are business authority; AI is advisory. |
| SmartDocumentChatbot | Can a user ask questions over owned documents with citations and a safe refusal? | The live RAG path and experimental agent path require separate verification. |
| AKS-SRE-Platform | Can a team review platform changes and prove what ran on Azure versus local kind? | Historical transient AKS evidence, local GitOps/observability proof, explicit non-claims. |
AKS/SRE claim to defend
The platform validated node placement, ACR digest pull and token exchange on transient AKS, then deleted the cluster. GitOps reconciliation, Gateway API and alert fire/resolve were measured on local kind. Autoscaler, enforced NetworkPolicy, DR and production SLO history remain unverified.
See the cross-repository interview guide and AKS claim matrix.